Time and Space Management

Question: Discuss about the Time and Space Management. Answer: Introduction: Space which is built with walls is often considered rentable commodity and cost money and therefore organizations pay a great importance for its management. Time has also attracted the attention of many scientists and researchers due to its features and boundaries in workplace cultures. The following report contains a critical analysis of the concept of time and space in organizational place which is often considered significant for the success of an organization. Organizational Time Concept: Time and its management have always been a matter of rising controversy among different organizations all over the world. This is mainly because the idea of time is evaluated and analyzed in a variety of ways among different cultures and social spheres. Therefore it has often given rise to various arguments among different researchers about its ever- evolving nature and its effects in the work fields. Many researchers state that the idea of time and the issues related to time management are based on social and cultural bonds. As a result, different beings have the scope of interpreting its power in different ways, and that varies according to various cultures. However, modern technology like emails has altogether inhibited the broadness of time and altered rhythm of activities. This had helped people to be expert in ruling time zone differences (Quinn 2014). However, human beings with different social and natural backgrounds often interpret time and plan their activities according to their interpretations and interactions that they have among themselves. Therefore meetings, personal work, organizational governance should always be conducted through proper interaction between participants to have the best outcome and productivity (Foster 2014). Organizational Space management: Just like time management, space management also raises different concerns among the architects. On critical analysis, one can assure that designing a workplace often results in a dilemma because the architects' aesthetic and scientific sense of building of houses faces a duel with preparing workplace with minimum finance and maximum capital gain (Alexander and Price 2013). Even organizations have therefore come forward with different sorts of concepts one being the hybrid workplace. This usually includes employees working from both homes and also in offices for the same organization thereby yielding greater productivity from minimum organization cost. The main technology that mainly acts as a backbone of this type of working culture is the ICT which is called the Information and Communication Technology. Open space offices are newer concepts that often act as challenges for the architectures. However, organizations believe that that concept of offices helps the employees to work mor e collaboratively and freely at the same time of saving space by the organization to cut costs. Many organizations have also found that putting fun at work, allowing private life in professional place and usurping employee's identity and exchanging them for appropriate organizational one are some of the manipulative lucrative offers that employers provide. However, recent researchers often acclaim that virtual offices instead of physical offices which is a much better way of handling space crisis and organize cost cuttings. Conclusion: Thereby space can be defined as functional and symbolic entities that share a close relationship with social organizations. Centralized locations are found to reduce costs. Managing employees in the distant workforce and their subsequent cooperation in carrying on with teamwork has become easy due to the availability of ICT (Hernandez-Ortega, Serrano-Cinca and Gomez-Meneses 2014). Similarly, an industrial workplace can practice efficiency, predictability and control within a specified time frame to bring out maximum productivity and success with the high brand image. Therefore one can easily assess the significance of time and space in industrial areas. References: Alexander, K. and Price, I. eds., 2013.Managing Organizational Ecologies: Space, Management, and Organizations(Vol. 22). Routledge. Forster, M., 2014.Do it tomorrow and other secrets of time management. Hachette UK. Hernandez-Ortega, B., Serrano-Cinca, C. and Gomez-Meneses, F., 2014. The firm's continuance intentions to use inter-organizational ICTs: The influence of contingency factors and perceptions.Information Management,51(6), pp.747-761. Quinn, M., 2014. Stability and change in management accounting over timeA century or so of evidence from Guinness.Management Accounting Research,25(1), pp.76-92.